The architect has handed you floor plates, and you need to figure out whether a moment frame system will work for seismic resistance. The problem? You don’t have member sizes yet. You don’t know the period. And without the period, you can’t pull loads from the response spectrum. Classic chicken-and-egg.
Another code cycle, another round of changes to get our heads around. Just when you think you’ve got your spreadsheets perfected, the new National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) lands on your desk. While the 2020 edition brought updates across the board, the wind load provisions in Subsection 4.1.7. have some particularly noteworthy changes that are already impacting our designs.
If you’re a structural engineer in Canada, you’ve stared at this equation more times than you can count:
$$S = I_s[S_s(C_b C_w C_s C_a) + S_r]$$It’s the backbone of our snow load calculations, a formula we trust to keep our buildings standing through the harshest Canadian winters. It’s important to remember this detailed formula is from NBCC Part 4; the approach for simpler structures is different, as we’ve covered in our guide to wind and snow loads in Part 4 vs. Part 9.
The first heavy, wet snow of the season is plastering everything in sight, and you get that familiar call from an architect: “We’re looking at a large, flat roof on this new project. What kind of snow load do we need?”
Solar panels, architectural sunshades, and complex multi-level rooflines are no longer the exception; they’re the norm in modern Canadian building design. While they score points for energy efficiency and visual appeal, they also create a minefield of unexpected snow and ice loads for structural engineers.
You’re finalizing a set of drawings, cross-checking load cases against the National Building Code, and wondering if you’ve caught every little detail. The NBCC is dense, and the Structural Commentaries explain the reasoning behind the rules. That’s where the gotchas hide.
So, you’ve just been handed a project with a decently sized retaining wall, and it’s in a location with some seismic kick. Immediately, you know that your standard static analysis isn’t going to cut it. The response of a retaining wall to seismic loading is a complex soil-structure interaction problem, and figuring out the right approach can be daunting. This is a classic example of where we move beyond simplified prescriptive rules and into the world of engineered precision using Part 4 principles.
I’m Arun Kishore, a Professional Engineer based in Vancouver, BC. I specialize in structural engineering for LNG facilities, civic water infrastructure, and advanced buildings — with a passion for automating the tedious stuff so engineers can focus on what matters.
Know More